On Feb 20, 2007, at 7:24 AM, Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Ivan Zvolsky wrote:
On 2/19/07, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ivan Zvolsky wrote:
> I have also put my efforts with drlvm building to HARMONY-3196.
The
patch
> makes drlvm buildable on windows/em64t (and shouldn't break
building on
> other platforms).
>
> It still has some things to do, which I described in subtasks for
> HARMONY-3196.
I looked at the patches and I have a question. You've added amd64
architecture in some select statements in the build along with em64t
flag. I thought that from the build point they are equivalent, and
build.arch property is defined in build.xml for all kinds of arch
(x86_64, em64t, amd64) to be equal to "em64t". Why add another
flag in
build files?
I can't remember why I added this. But I just tried to modify all
selects
like "em64t,amd64" to simply "em64t" and the build worked fine.
What is the
best option to do:
1) should I replace drlvm_build_system.patch with newer version?
2) or add newer version without removing the old one?
3) or prepare a patch for drlvm_build_system.patch file?
I'll take care about it myself. I'll remove all amd64 flags.
Converting em64t to x86_64 may be done later separately from
enabling x86_64 windows.
If you are going to be doing it anyway, why not convert to "x86_64"?
geir
On 2/16/07, Ivan Zvolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Some time ago, I found out that Harmony is not buildable on
Windows /
>> x86_64 (EM64T).
>> I tried to reanimate at least the build which has required to
update
both
>> classlib and drlvm build files, create stubs for some
functions, etc.
>>
>> I've put my results (for now only classlib part) to HARMONY-3188.
>> Could someone take a look? The comments are welcome.
>>
>> In particular, Geir might want to look at the first comment in
the
>> description :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Gregory
--
Gregory
