I think the AllTest makes sense only when some one want to run test suites partly. I had never used it but I'm not sure if there is somebody who perfer that way.
Well, seems AllTest is a history now. It doesn't make use of exclude lists and etc. Moreover, some modules does not support it - i.e. does not have AllTest.. IIRC we have agreed that storing grouping information in java source is (generally) not a very good idea. Thanks, 2007/2/28, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 2/28/07, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, Stepan > > Seems like the key is "cleaned my working copy" here. Because I saw no > problems when tested my commit. > yes, there might be a TestBasicControl.class in classpath if did not clean. > BTW, do these "AllTest" make sense? Does anybody use them? > We do'nt have all the tests included into "AllTest", so it might make > sense to get rid of them > I think the AllTest makes sense only when some one want to run test suites partly. I had never used it but I'm not sure if there is somebody who perfer that way. > Thanks, > Mikhail > > 2007/2/28, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 2/28/07, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I cleaned my working copy and ran "ant -Dbuild.module=jndi test", > > > then I got following compile error. > > > > > > Fixed at r512588. > > > > -Stepan. > > > > [javac] 1. ERROR in > > > > > > /home/clear/trunk/modules/jndi/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/jndi/tests/javax/naming/ldap/AllTestLdap.java > > > [javac] (at line 49) > > > [javac] suite.addTest(new TestSuite(TestBasicControl.class)); > > > [javac] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > [javac] TestBasicControl cannot be resolved to a type > > > [javac] ---------- > > > [javac] 1 problem (1 error) > > > > > > I did not find the TestBasicControl.java in jndi src. > > >
-- Alexei Zakharov, Intel ESSD
