That's will be a doom to find out what testcases have been excluded.
On 3/5/07, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/5/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 3, 2007, at 11:48 PM, Ruth Cao wrote: > > > 2007/3/3, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> Why not leave them in the exclude list? > > > > > > Since in some tests (i.e. > > tests.api.java.net.HttpURLConnectionTest), we can > > get all the test cases out of the exclude list using Jetty except > > the one > > which needs a proxy server. If we comment out the related one, more > > test > > cases can be run continuously. > > Got it. Too bad there isn't a notation for excluding specific tests, > rather than just test classes : > > org.apache.harmony.whatever.Foo#testWoogie How about to use _testXXX to exclude a test case? > > > Also, what do we need from Jetty? > > > > > > We need a ProxyHandler that can start an embeded proxy server. > > Jetty 6 has a > > plan to implement it, but it seems that it won't be available in a > > short > > time[1] :-) > > > > [1] http://www.nabble.com/Jetty6-proxy-handler-t2721411.html > > > > Greg and Jan are really great > >> people, and may be willing to help us out, especially when they find > >> out that the World's First Implementation of Open Source Java needs > >> it :) > >> > >> geir > >> > >> On Mar 1, 2007, at 1:50 AM, Alexei Zakharov wrote: > >> > >> >> that's not a bad idea, we can find all TODOs in exclude lists > >> rather > >> >> than src code. > >> > > >> > Yes, this is exactly what I mean. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > 2007/3/1, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >> Thanks Alexei, > >> >> > >> >> that's not a bad idea, we can find all TODOs in exclude lists > >> rather > >> >> than src code. > >> >> I'll try if no one object. > >> >> > >> >> On 2/28/07, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > Hi Tony, > >> >> > > >> >> > IIRC we have agreed that commenting out test code is not the > >> best > >> >> > possible solution. Can we just split off proxy-related tests > >> into a > >> >> > separate test class (<something>ProxyTest for example) and > >> then put > >> >> > this new class to exclude list? > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > > >> >> > 2007/2/27, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >> > > Hello all, > >> >> > > I have been working on moving out the exclude tests in > >> >> java.net these > >> >> > > days. Some of them need a proxy server. IIRC we have adopted > >> >> jetty to > >> >> > > avoid external server dependencies before, but > >> unfortunately, the > >> >> > > ProxyHandler of Jetty has not been implemented yet. So I > >> >> purpose to > >> >> > > comment out the proxy related testcases and move out the test > >> >> class > >> >> > > from exclude list. I'll add a TODO in the code and wait for > >> the > >> >> > > upcoming new version of Jetty. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Another way is tha find out another tool to set up a proxy > >> >> server. In > >> >> > > my opinion, we'd better not import another dependency if > >> >> possible. And > >> >> > > if it is not an embedding server, we have to write some ugly > >> >> code in > >> >> > > order to run test automatically. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > suggestions?concerns? > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Alexei Zakharov, > >> > Intel ESSD > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > Ruth Cao > > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > -- Best regards, Andrew Zhang
-- Tony Wu China Software Development Lab, IBM
