On Mar 5, 2007, at 5:37 AM, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
05 Mar 2007 12:30:05 +0300, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On the 0x290 day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> According to our high-level roadmap [1] we were going to make our
> first release in Q2. Let's define what we would like to see in
our Q2
> release. If there are no objections let's discuss what we want that
> release being able to do.
>
> I suggest that we focus on stability measured by being able to
> successfully run a few solid applications and by pass rates for the
> test suites.
> So, I think in Q2 we should 1) run reasonable set of
applications 2)
> have reasonable testing infrastructure and 3) pass reasonable
set of
> test suites.
>
> Though we will be happy to accept all the patches that fix existing
> problems or add missing functionality, I suggest that people who
hang
> around will focus on those scenarios that we will choose here
>
> Objections? :)
>
> If there are no objections again, I'd like to propose that we
will target:
>
> 1) keeping all the enabled apps in the "up" state
> (we will create a list of enabled apps and put them all into
cruise control)
>
> 2) running 2-3 open source server-side software
>
>
> 3) running 2-3 open source developers tools
>
>
> 4) setting up necessary testing infrastructure and having near 100%
> pass rates for the suites we have
>
>
> 5) what about commercial software? Some time ago we agreed that
it's
> OK to report failures/regression of commercial software. Should we
> have them in the "requirements" to our Q2 release?
>
> Since currently the most stable platform is Windows/IA32 I suggest
> that Harmony Q2 will be released on that specific platform
you mean, we have no time for 2 platforms?
I mean we should IMHO make a focus: have superb results on a single
platform on a limited set of applications rather than have million
somehow working scenarios
on a dozen of platforms.
No. I disagree strongly. We aren't talking about "a dozen". We're
talking 2-3
geir
Thanks,
Mikhail
--
Egor Pasko
