On 3/6/07, Ruth Cao wrote:
Hello Stepan, It's really too late for me to reply :-( ... I've tried your patch and run all tests on both windows xp and red hat linux, IBM VME. It seems that it has passed the o.a.h.rmi.RegistryTest on both platforms. As for LogManagerTest, now it has already been excluded in the logging module. So is it possible that the crash you have encountered is due to other problems (such as Harmony-3075 and Harmony-3142)? Pls correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks.
Hi Ruth, Thanks for trying the patch. I'll look into the issues you've mentioned. -Stepan Stepan Mishura (JIRA) wrote:
> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel] > > Stepan Mishura updated HARMONY-2910: > ------------------------------------ > > Attachment: Harmony-2910.diff > > Hi Ruth, > > Sorry for delay with response. You update looks OK for me. I just modified CodeSource recreation and moved it to PolicyEntry.impliesCodeSource(). Also I simplified PolicyUtils.normalizeURL(). > > But simplification of normalizeURL() method I've discovered one more problem in security code. If you run a refreshed patch (from Feb 06) you will see tests crashes: > org.apache.harmony.logging.tests.java.util.logging.LogManagerTest > org.apache.harmony.rmi.RegistryTest > > It looks like there is a cyclic dependency in security code. So I'm going to wait with the patch applying until the cyclic dependency is investigated and resolved. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > Stepan. > > > >> [classlib][security] Harmony cannot identify 'codeBase' feature in policy file >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Key: HARMONY-2910 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2910 >> Project: Harmony >> Issue Type: Bug >> Components: Classlib >> Reporter: Ruth Cao >> Assigned To: Stepan Mishura >> Attachments: Harmony-2910-2.zip, Harmony-2910.diff, Harmony-2910.diff, Harmony-2910.diff, regressionTest2910.txt >> >> >> create a simple policy file and then run PolicyTest with the argument and the policy file[1] as following on Windows XP: >> -Dtest.bin.dir=c:\api\ -Djava.security.policy=<policy file path> >> public class PolicyTest { >> public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { >> Policy p = Policy.getPolicy(); >> ProtectionDomain pd = new ProtectionDomain(new CodeSource(new URL( >> "file:/c:/api/*"), ( java.security.cert.Certificate[]) null), null); >> PermissionCollection pCollection = p.getPermissions(pd); >> Enumeration<Permission> elements = pCollection.elements(); >> while (elements.hasMoreElements()) { >> if(elements.nextElement().equals(new AllPermission())){ >> System.out.println("contains AllPermission"); >> } >> } >> } >> } >> RI prints: >> contains AllPermission >> while Harmony prints nothing. >> [1] >> grant codeBase "file:${test.bin.dir}/-" { >> permission java.security.AllPermission; >> }; >> > >
-- Stepan Mishura Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
