Hi all, For everyone's convenience and not to lose any ideas, I've tried to sum up this thread on a wiki page. http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Harmony_Q2_Milestone
Cheers, Nadya >-----Original Message----- >From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 5:36 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [general] Harmony Q2 release requirements > > >On Mar 6, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Mikhail Loenko wrote: > >> 2007/3/6, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> I think that each release should be well tested and documented. We >>> should do the release train, with each release getting better and >>> better - no regressions unless we all agree there's a darn good >>> reason for it. >> >> What would be the interval between the releases in the "train"? >> If it's 3 months then yes we can have such a train. If it's a week >> then >> we all will be busy with releases and won' have time for coding > >Monthly? I think we can play it by ear - move forward, and adjust as >we learn things. Also, we need to work it out so things don't grind >to a halt at release time. > >I'll start a second thread to discuss this approach. > >geir
