OK, it's just a thought. Some of the JIRA comments are excellent and focussed actually. Somehow most concerned parties seem to find their way there :-)
On 3/7/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Rana Dasgupta wrote: > My thought was that if we have a JIRA related "discussion" on the > list, the > intent is possibly to invite more comments, not just from the > submitter and > reviewer. If one feels that this broader participation or interest is > necessary, it may be a good idea for whoever posts it on the list > to add a > few words to provide some context and background on the problem, which > should not be hard to do. Otherwise, the discussion stays closed. But I think that we always want to invite broader participation and interest. if people bite, great. If they don't, no harm done. I actually engaged on weldons question, looking at what he was talking about. I hate reading through JIRa comments :) geir > > > > On 3/6/07, Salikh Zakirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Rana Dasgupta wrote: >> > IMHO we may be better off if we post brief discussions on >> > commits/reviews on >> > the JIRA, rather than on the list, unless it is an architectural >> issue >> or >> > one where several opinions could add value. There seem to be >> several >> > threads >> > where the entire thread consists of a single post and a >> response :-) >> >> Rana, >> >> there is nothing wrong in a single post and a response, because the >> purpose of >> harmony-dev posting is to discuss things *in public*, rather than >> having >> hot >> discussions all the time. >> >> Should Weldon posted his comment in JIRA, I would probably miss it. >> >> And, by the way, using locks *is* an architectural issue. >> >>
