It is indirectly used in the NSO for Class.newInstance. But this code is not
currently executed, since Class.newInstance is not implemented in Java.

WBR,
   Pavel.
On 3/21/07, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Pavel, Thanks for your reply.

Would let me know how NEXT_TO_HIGH_BIT is used currently in DRLVM? Or
in other words, what functionalities are dependent on
NEXT_TO_HIGH_BIT?

Thanks,
xiaofeng

On 3/21/07, Pavel Pervov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Xiao-Feng,
>
> All the infructructure is in place. It is just do not work at the
moment.
> As Class.newInstance is not native, NSO does not replace it's
implementation
> with VM's stub.
> If NEXT_TO_HIGH_BIT-supporting code is to be removed, the rest of the
code
> (NSO implementations for ia32 and ia64) has to be removed altogether to
not
> provoke any errors in the future.
>
> Does removing NSO overrides for Class.newInstance look reasonable for
you?
>
> WBR,
>     Pavel.
>
> On 3/21/07, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If no one objects, I will try to remove this flag in DRLVM.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > xiaofeng
> >
> > On 3/21/07, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi, the source code for class preparation calls
> > > set_instance_data_size_constraint_bit() for three situations:
special
> > > alignment requirement, having finalizer, and to be pinned. And the
> > > comments there say the constraint bit is for GC to understand.
> > >
> > > But current GC actually doesn't care about this bit, and simply
masks
> > > it off. Does anybody know what are the situations for the size
> > > constraint bit to be set for allocation?
> > >
> > > I recall this kind of constraint bit was ORP legacy, when the
> > > intention was for gc_alloc_fast to be really fast, avoiding any
> > > special allocation treatment. So once the big flag is set,
> > > gc_alloc_fast will simply return NULL, and the VM will invoke
gc_alloc
> > > to accomplish the allocation.
> > >
> > > Now DRLVM has different processing, and the GC doesn't use the flag
in
> > > size for allocation. I wonder what is the real purpose of this size
> > > flag in allocation.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > xiaofeng
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Pavel Pervov,
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>




--
Pavel Pervov,
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division

Reply via email to