On Mar 25, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Is this meant to replace our current MX4J based implementation, or
enhance it?
To enhance, of course. Why replace a good thing?
:)
Vasily
-----Original Message-----
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 12:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Contribution of JMX and JMX remote connectors
On Mar 22, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi, all!
I'd like to announce the contribution of JMX implementation and JMX
optional remote connectors implementation on behalf of Intel
Corporation.
They could be found at:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3473 (JMX)
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3474 (connectors).
I think it would be helpful to use some solutions of this
contribution
for improving MX4J and creating state-of-the-art JMX implementation
for
Harmony.
I don't understand. Is this meant to replace our current MX4J based
implementation, or enhance it?
I welcome you to try the contribution and share your opinions.
Thanks,
Vasily Zakharov
Intel ESSD
