I will track down the logs right now. I have no problem continuing work on h3065 (I thought you might want an easy excuse to set it aside.)
On 3/27/07, Peter Novodvorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be very disappointing to leave it, because me and Pavel Afremov already gave too much time to this patch. However, in general, I agree that we should put off performance patches and concentrate on architecture and stability. Weldon, could you please send us the log with and error, because I run tests with patch from H-3065 applied and see no problems. Thanks, Peter. On 3/27/07, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, h3065 patch fails the jitrino.OPT tests on windowsxp. Since > this is a performance patch and has failed three or four attempts to commit, > how about recoding this patch as "later"? This will give us a chance to > focus on basic stability problems. Once the system is stable, we can go > back and fix the performance issues. > > -- > Weldon Washburn > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division >
-- Weldon Washburn Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
