Okay, I'm trying that out now. Can the JIT be a little smarter and not
use instructions that aren't available? We certainly can't limit
available platforms to P4 or newer.

-Nathan

On 3/30/07, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok I think I know what's going on. DRLVM JIT generates SSE2 instructions,
and according to the subject, you are using P3. SSE2 is not available on P3
and will generate SIGILL on it. So it is most likely not related to JVMTI
implementation. To prove this you can try to run "build.sh smoke.test" which
should execute pure Java without any JVMTI.

If you could please do

x/1i $eip $eip+1

in gdb to disassemble the failing address to see what instruction caused
SIGILL.

2007/3/30, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I might have to take that back. I tried running a simple class and it
> bombed out with "Illegal instruction". Here's what I got from GDB run,
> below. Note, I'm still pretty green when it comes to Linux development
> tools, so I may sound like an idiot right now.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> :~/harmony/drlvm-trunk/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/deploy/jdk/jre/bin$
> gdb --args ./java -cp ~/workspace/helloworld/bin/ HelloWorld
> GNU gdb 6.6-debian
> Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
> are
> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
> conditions.
> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for
> details.
> This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu"...
> Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
> (gdb) run
> Starting program:
>
> 
/home/nathan/harmony/drlvm-trunk/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/deploy/jdk/jre/bin/java
> -cp /home/nathan/workspace/helloworld/bin/ HelloWorld
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> [New Thread -1214162256 (LWP 13833)]
> [New Thread -1215321200 (LWP 13836)]
> [New process 13833]
> [New LWP 13833]
>
> Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
> Cannot remove breakpoints because program is no longer writable.
> It might be running in another process.
> Further execution is probably impossible.
> 0xb7b0c2ab in ?? () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> (gdb)
>
>
> On 3/29/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am not seeing that. Can you run the "./java -version" successfully?
> >
> > I tried running "gdb ./java" and it loaded me into GDB just fine.
> >
> > -Nathan
> >
> > On 3/29/07, Rana Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The jvmti tests are among the first to run. Is it a problem with jvmti
> > > failures or is drlvm currently broken on linux? I seem to get a
> segmentation
> > > violation running just the drlvm java executable on both 32 and 64 bit
> RHEL
> > > Linux.
> > >
> > > gdb java
> > >
> > > I think shows an invalid pointer in hymem_free_memory()
> > >
> > > Is anyone else seeing this?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/29/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 3/29/07, Gregory Shimansky < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Nathan Beyer wrote:
> > > > > > On 3/28/07, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >> Nathan Beyer wrote:
> > > > > >> > I'm getting consistent failures of the following tests on
> Ubuntu
> > > > > >> > 7.04-dev running on Quad Xeon P3 hardware. I saw some other
> threads
> > > > on
> > > > > >> > the mailing list about failures on a dual CPU machine, are
> these
> > > > the
> > > > > >> > same failures.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Is there anyway to get some more information about these
> failures?
> > > > > >> > Stack trace? dumps?
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > -Nathan
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Breakpoint1 failed on Client mode JIT (default)
> > > > > >> > SingleStep1 failed on Client mode JIT (default)
> > > > > >> > VMInit1 failed on Client mode JIT (default)
> > > > > >> > Breakpoint1 failed on interpreter
> > > > > >> > SingleStep1 failed on interpreter
> > > > > >> > VMInit1 failed on interpreter
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The tests produce a report in
> > > > > >> lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/semis/jvmti.tests/reports which you can try
> to
> > > > > >> analyze. There should be the output why the tests failed. The
> tests
> > > > > >> you've mentioned are single threaded and shouldn't depend on
> the
> > > > number
> > > > > >> of CPUs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm seeing three folders under
> > > > > > "build/lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/semis/jvmti.tests/reports/" and "int",
> "jit"
> > > > > > and "opt" folder. All of them are empty.
> > > > >
> > > > > Try this command line to run the test in command line. Tests have
> to be
> > > > > compiled before running it
> > > > >
> > > > > ./lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/deploy/jdk/jre/bin/java -cp
> > > > > make/tmp/junit.jar:./lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/semis/jvmti.tests/classes
> > > > >
> > > >
> 
-agentpath:./lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/semis/jvmti.tests/native/Breakpoint1/libBreakpoint1.so
> > > > > junit.textui.TestRunner Breakpoint1.Breakpoint1
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Gregory
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I tried that and this is what is output to the console (the report
> > > > folders are still empty).
> > > >
> > > > DEBUG: Getting JVMTI enviroment...
> > > > DEBUG: done!
> > > > DEBUG: Setting capabilities...
> > > > DEBUG: done!
> > > > DEBUG: Setting events...
> > > > DEBUG: done!
> > > > Illegal instruction
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



--
Gregory

Reply via email to