As I replied to Nathan before, yes, it looks like we can make this dependency optional.
SY, Alexey 2007/4/2, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Nathan Beyer wrote: > On 3/31/07, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'd call out the current Windows OS support as "Windows 2000 >> Professional with SP3, or better". Not sure that we have anyone testing >> on that version, but I'd be interested to know if people don't think >> that is achievable. > > I have a Windows 2000 (on a P3) box running buildtest now, but it's > blowing up. I couldn't get DRLVM to do much of anything. The classlib > + ibmvm runs, but the tests for AWT/Swing always fail because they're > dependent on some XP/2003 library. Can anyone tell us what it will take to get AWT and Swing to work on Windows 2000? Regards, Tim
