On 13 April 2007 at 16:53, "Nathan Beyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't have a particular desire to grab this one, just want to keep > this moving. > > I guess a better question would be, has anyone else tried out this > patch? Good? Bad? No difference?
I took a (very) quick look a day or so ago. The code looked good. (Though I'd probably have refactored the platform-specific native code to hysysinfo.c which has similar code - I'm happy to do this later when I'm less busy with porting to classlib to Aix.) However, I couldn't actually get the regression test to fail whether I applied the rest of the patch or not so it was hard to trivially check if it had really improved things. (This could be fixed later too I suppose.) Regards, Mark. > On 4/13/07, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nathan Beyer wrote: > > > It looks like Tim took assignment of this issue. Tim, are you working > > > on this one? > > > > If you have time to take it then please go ahead and steal it from me. > > It may be a few days before I get to study it properly (I guess my main > > concern would be performance impact of a memory check on each alloc). > > > > Regards, > > Tim > > >
