I agree that we need to add the lock as well on windows. BTW - the
locking for RW barriers was pulled from this document [1]. The lock
instruction seemed the best of the three options; use mfence (not an
option), use no-op lock or cpuid, which is apparently very slow.

Another option would be looking at the operation just after the
barrier; according to this [1], any lock-prefixed instruction will
work on x86, so instead of a lock and wasted instruction, we could
lock with the next instruction. Though, this may only be something a
JIT would do.

What does the EM64T mean? Isn't that just saying P4? I'm still not
quite clear on the differences between EM6T, IPF, x86_64/x64, etc? How
do these map to the builds? There's not a separate EM64T end state,
right?

If that does just mean a P4, I don't think this code snippet is
correct, unless we're going to start separating our builds that way.

[1] http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/jmm/cookbook.html

-Nathan

On 4/20/07, Rana Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nathan,
   I was going through your patch and had a small suggestion. We had
discussed on other related threads that on Windows we wanted to use
the MSVC provided _ReadWriteBarrier intrinsic and the patch does that,
but this may not be enough. This generates no instruction, but is a
compiler fence only. x86 does not need a store fence, but for smp the
load fence can be certainly needed.
  That's the assumption on Linux where in apr_memory_rw_barrier() we
insert both a compiler and an instruction fence, eg.,

apr_memory_rw_barrier()
{
...
#else
asm volatile ("lock; addl $0, 0(%%esp)":::"memory");
...
}

I agree that since there is no mfence on PIII, probably the dummy lock
is the safest option for x86 wide code. But  "lock" is expensive,
specially for Pentium 4 , Centrino etc. which have the "mfence"
instruction. And this penalty on current platforms is only on Linux.
My suggestion is to do the same on Windows as well. If we need the
real fence, we need it on both....So on Windows...

On Windows in apr_thread_ext.c:
================================
#if _MSC_VER < 1400
        extern void _ReadWriteBarrier();
#else
        #include <intrin.h>
#endif
#pragma intrinsic (_ReadWriteBarrier)

APR_DECLARE(void) apr_memory_rw_barrier(){
#ifdef _EM64T_
        // create rwfence64() in asm file port\src\thread\win\rwfence.asm
        rwfence64();
#else
        __asm {lock add [esp], 0 }
#endif
       _ReadWriteBarrier();
}

In port\src\thread\win\rwfence.asm:
===================================
PUBLIC rwfence64

_TEXT SEGMENT

rwfence64 PROC

        mfence


PROC ENDP
TEXT ENDS

What do you think?

Thanks,
Rana

On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I have this resolved with this commit [1]. I'm now able to run
> DRLVM in interpreted mode on my Quad P3 ... at least a 'Hello World'
> app.
>
> -Nathan
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=529880
>
> On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've run into another SSE2 operation in DRLVM, this time it's in the
> > hythr library, but I can't find the specific instance. According to
> > GDB, it's happening in fast_thread_array() in libhythr.so.
> >
> > Is this from the 'apr_thread_ext.c' file? I'm going to attempt to
> > modify this to be like the changes I made to the 'atomics.cpp', so
> > that this can run on P3 (SSE) CPUs.
> >
> > [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:~/harmony/drlvm-trunk/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/deploy/jdk/jre/bin$
> > ./java -Xint -cp /home/nathan/workspace/helloworld/bin HelloWorld
> > Illegal instruction
> > [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:~/harmony/drlvm-trunk/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/deploy/jdk/jre/bin$
> > gdb --args ./java -Xint -cp /home/nathan/workspace/helloworld/bin
> > HelloWorld
> > GNU gdb 6.6-debian
> > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
> > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain 
conditions.
> > Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
> > This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu"...
> > Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
> > (gdb) run
> > Starting program:
> > 
/home/nathan/harmony/drlvm-trunk/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/deploy/jdk/jre/bin/java
> > -Xint -cp /home/nathan/workspace/helloworld/bin HelloWorld
> > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> > [New Thread -1214834000 (LWP 32414)]
> > [New Thread -1215992944 (LWP 32417)]
> > [New process 32414]
> > [New LWP 32414]
> >
> > Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
> > 0xb7bc543f in fast_thread_array ()
> >    from 
/home/nathan/harmony/drlvm-trunk/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/deploy/jdk/jre/bin/libhythr.so
> > (gdb) x/1i $eip
> > 0xb7bc543f <fast_thread_array+510367>:  mfence
> > (gdb)
> >
>

Reply via email to