Yep, it is possible of course. I've added this task to my nearest-future-to-do-list but have not complete it yet. :)
I'll finish it this week. SY, Alexey 2007/4/25, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Stuart, As it was discussed in the thread I'm copying, we are free to replace classes in the packages listed here [1] by "classes implementing a more recent version of the API as defined by the appropriate standards body" [2] Would it be possible to generate JAPI diffs not taking into account packages listed in [1] so that we get clear picture about amount of API work remained? Thanks, Mikhail [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/standards/index.html [2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html 2007/1/23, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > 2007/1/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> so what do we do? I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve this > >> w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here... > > That would be great. Can you suggest something? > > As Alexey wrote, the level of CORBA support in the RI 5.0 [1] is > predominantly 2.3.1 based. However, we are free to implement a later > version of the Corba spec and still be compliant since the CORBA code is > an "endorsed standard" (see [2]). > > In this case I suggest we support Yoko in their goal of implementing > corba 2.4 (and ignore the JAPI diffs). > > [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/idl/compliance.html > [2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html > > Regards, > Tim > >
