Great. So CCs for x86 are up and all the critical issues are resolved.
It looks like time for freeze and prepare a build.

Did I forget something? Any other critical issues?

SY, Alexey

2007/4/27, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> DRLVM has been switched back to GCv4.
> HARMONY-3764 "[drlvm][build] jar with kernel classes' sources is not
> generated" has been resolved
> Patch for HARMONY-3730 "[drlvm][jvmti] SINGLE_STEP events are not
> reported in JIT mode" has been applied but the issue is not closed.
> Gregory, do you have anything to do with this issue or you just forgot
> to press resolve button? :)

Sorry, just forgot to mark it resolved indeed. Done now.

> 2007/4/26, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
>> > On 4/26/07, Sergey Kuksenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> I wish to notify that GCv5 currently has a stability problem.
>> >>
>> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3746
>> >> I think We should fix the bug before freese or switch back to GCv4.1.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I noticed that, and am trying to reproduce it, so far can't reproduce
>> > it locally. I am now trying to connect the test machine to check the
>> > problem. Hopefully it can be fixed quite soon within two days.
>> > Otherwise, I'd vote to switch it back to GCv4.1.
>> >
>> > The other solution would be to choose a revision and make a release
>> > branch from it. Then we don't need to freeze the code base for new
>> > developments. This is actually common for industry product release.
>>
>> Ok, let's wait and see what you conclude.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>


--
Gregory


Reply via email to