On 5/3/07, Pavel Pervov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The reason I ask is because I am working on threading memory leaks that > assume GCV5.
How come? Shouldn't DRLVM's TM be GC independent? Yes, that is the goal. And we will get there over time. And a good way to do this is to set GCV4.1 aside and complete the integration of MMTk. --
Pavel Pervov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
-- Weldon Washburn
