Hi All, Indeed, ~95% of time we spend in jitted code when running jbb2005. Other %% are spreaded among native code, no one module takes > 2-3%.
I've just cheked the patch on jbb2005 @ win32 (prescott and woodcrest, both gvc4.1 and gcv5) and linux64 (woodcrest, gcv4.1). 1.5G heap was used. No boost has been measured. All difference is in uncertainty range (< 1%). An assumption may be that 2.41% boost was measured with default heap size and impact of native code was higher in this case. -- Thanks, Rustem
