Olivier Thomann wrote:
news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2007-05-23 10:21:42:
Thank you for the pointer Oliver. I've created a new bug on ECJ [1]. Let
me know if you need more information.
Looks like I have all I need. I'll prepare a patch for it. It will be
based on 3.3 though.
Do you need a patch for the 3.2 maintenance stream ?
I reported the bug on version 3.2.2 because that is the version where
I've reproduced it. I think unless someone else thinks otherwise 3.3 is
good enough for us. Thanks a lot for a quick response!
--
Gregory
