Tony Wu wrote: > Hi, > Seems RI cached some bytes, which can be read even if the jarfile has > been closed. I wonder what's your opinion about that? should we follow > RI to cache the bytes and should we use the buffer size the same as > RI?
Sounds like a bug in the RI to me. If the JAR is closed I would not expect to be able to read from it. I suggest closing as a non-bug difference. Regards, Tim
