On 25 June 2007 at 13:59, "Stepan Mishura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/24/07, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We have passed our code freeze date for M2 > > > > Mikhail, > > Just to be clear - M1 milestone published snapshots include build for > Windows x86, Linux (libstdc++ v5 and libstdc++ v6) x86 and Windows > x86_64.
Do you think it would be possible to produce source snapshots? The Apache release FAQ (at http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html ) says: The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All releases are in the form of the source materials needed to make changes to the software being released. In some cases, binary/bytecode packages are also produced as a convenience to users that might not have the appropriate tools to build a compiled version of the source. In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package must have the same version number as the source release and may only add binary/bytecode files that are the result of compiling that version of the source code release. Currently binaries are our primary artifact. I appreciated that it may be a little late to try to correct this for this release, but I think it is important that we try to correct this before we get too comfortable with the current release process. It should now be possible to do: ant bundle_src mkdir /tmp/build tar -C /tmp/build -xzf target/apache-harmony-src-r550411-snapshot.tar.gz cd /tmp/build/harmony-src-550411 ant -Dauto.fetch=true which would seem to me to be more in-keeping with the Apache release guidelines. On this subject, I'd like to permission to commit a patch to correct the top-level directory name in the source tar.gz/zip files from: harmony-src-550411 to: apache-harmony-src-r550411 The format of the archive names changed over time and these have become inconsistent. Regards, Mark. > I assume that we still aimed to x86 architecture and I need to build > milestone candidates for: > - Windows x86 > - Linux x86. BWT, again for both libstdc++ versions? > > And what about x86_64? > > As I said M1 includes Windows x86_64. Should we publish them to let > the community test them to see how good they are? > > Thanks, > Stepan.
