Nina,
but also Sun's verifier bug
Mmm, I'm not sure I follow. Isn't it enough to have a bug against Eclipse compiler to forget about this issue?
Thank you, Alexei On 7/6/07, Nina Rinskaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexei, I'm just not sure how we track compatibility issues if there is a difference in Harmony and RI behavior. Is it now proven that it's not only Eclipse Compiler, but also Sun's verifier bug? If yes, I agree that it's not necessary to reopen the issue. -- Nina On 7/6/07, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nina, > > Eclipse bug owner confirmed that this was an issue with the compiler. > Why do you want to reopen the issue against DRLVM? > > Thanks. > > On 7/6/07, Nina Rinskaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm writing this just to bring your attention to > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3862 and ask drlvm/verifier > > people to see whether it's necessary to reopen it. > > > > It says about VerifyError trown by Harmony when running a class compiled > by > > Eclipse Compiler. It was closed as 'Cannot Reproduced', but it is > actually > > reproduced (see HARMONY-3862 comments). It looks that it's not Harmony > > issue, but Eclipse compiler issue (I opened the bug against Eclipse > > compiler: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=194398), and RI > > issue (it should also throw VerifyError, but it doesn't). But still we > have > > different behavior on RI and Harmony implementations. > > > > So could someone take care of this issue and probably reopen it as > > compatibility issue if it makes sense? Thanks! > > > > -- > > Nina > > > > > -- > With best regards, > Alexei, > ESSD, Intel >
-- With best regards, Alexei, ESSD, Intel
