2007/10/24, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Egor Pasko wrote: > > On the 0x379 day of Apache Harmony Tim Ellison wrote: > >> Alexey Petrenko wrote: > >>> Yes, it would be nice to publish the results. This can be a good step > >>> for Harmony. > >>> Tim, can you please comment on the possibility? > >> I believe that there were discussions between SPEC and the ASF, before > >> my time, that came to nothing. Not sure if anything has changed since. > > > > Tim, > > > > is it necessary for us that SPEC results are published by means of > > ASF? Maybe it is possible that some committer buys a license, measures > > all by him/herself and publishes the result? or more complicated way: > > give someone a right to publish scores? > > I don't know the details of SPEC reporting. That would be an issue > between the individual and SPEC organization. > > > also, if the discussion you mentioned is googleable, I would be happy > > to take a look at the devil details, since, really, times could have > > changed. Sorry, could not find any relevant link :( > > My information is just based upon an informal discussion with a Geronimo > developer. Sorry, I don't know more about it than that. > > At least this link [1] implies somebody was trying to run it. > > [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/specjappserver2004.html Actually the situation is quite different for Sjbb, and also changed for SjAS with the introduction of EAStress in 1.08 version. SPEC made a large step forward to Open Source community and Apache – why should not we use the momentum and publish the scores?
Tim, Is there any process in Apache to make such decisions? It should be :) Can we have a try to start this process again? Thanks in advance. SY, Alexey
