> > I'm not yet convinced that we should generally move away from using > > APR instead of moving APR closer to what we want. > > That would be a huge task and I see no sign of effort being applied to > that problem. I'd like to be wrong though?
Hmm, it might be easier to advance Harmony portlib to separate (sub)project as alternative to APR. > > The portlib API is a good deal more flexible. (Nevertheless, it might > be an interesting exercise to implement portlib on APR.) There is one more dependency on APR existing in DRLVM, it is log4cxx. Anyway, I doubt we can afford moving from APR in near future, benefits are not so evident to force this task. -- Alexey
