I can not find the patch you are going to commit in the issue... Thanks in advance.
SY, Alexey 2008/2/18, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > All, > > As it was agreed I'm going to commit the changes to the Struts > scenario to let it follow the current Harmony behavior - we may use it > for the snapshot testing after fixing it. See HARMONY-5498 for > details. I'm waiting for other committer's vote. > > Thanks, > Alexei > > 2008/2/14, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > The senario test is writtern by ourselves. My question is, will this > > > > difference block the struts or not? > > > > I can't say that Struts is *blocked* by this difference. It just uses > > it in one of its standard examples. And our struts scenario checks > > that example. In respect that the example itself is not a production > > application and RI's behavior looks strange indeed I agree we may mark > > it as a non-bug difference and fix Struts scenario to follow the > > current Harmony behavior. > > > > Alexei > > > > 2008/2/13, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Tony Wu wrote: > > > > Tim, Alexei > > > > Seems it is locale dependent. I tried several locales, there is a > > > > empty string in the output. I can not tell why RI behaves like this. > > > > > > > > The senario test is writtern by ourselves. My question is, will this > > > > difference block the struts or not? If it blocks struts we have to > > > > work around even if the fix does harm to performance. If not, let's > > > > keep it as non-bug difference and find out the reason. > > > > > > My inclination is to leave the current behavior as-is, a non-bug > > > difference until we get a compelling reason to duplicate this 'bug'. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Tim > > >
