Welcome 2008/2/22, Jim Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, all > > I would like to join this update work. Sean, I have interests to implement > the new features for JDWP of JDK 6. > As you described, the update target is clear now. Maybe we can work > together > to do that. Thanks! > > > 2008/2/22, Sean Qiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hi, all > > > > I have summarized the protocol differences between JDK 6 and JDK 5. > > And after going through the JDWP code in trunk 5, it is really well > > structured which will greatly facilitate the updates work. > > Once Jimmy create the branch, i will start the work if no one object. > > > > *Command set* > > *Command* *Difference* *ReferenceType Command Set* Instances (New) > > ClassFileVersion > > (New) ConstantPool (New) *VirtualMachine Command Set* InstanceCounts > > (New) *ObjectReference Command Set* ReferringObjects > > (New) *ThreadReference > > Command Set* OwnedMonitorsStackDepthInfo(New) ForceEarlyReturn (New) > > *VirtualMachine > > Command Set* CapabilitiesNew canGetInstanceInfo > canRequestMonitorEvents > > canGetMonitorFrameInfo canUseSourceNameFilters canGetConstantPool > > canForceEarlyReturn *EventRequest Command Set* Set Command Case > ClassOnly > > - > > if modKind is 4 (change) Case ClassMatch - if modKind is 5 (change) > > Case > > ClassExclude - if modKind is 6 (change) Case SourceNameMatch - if > > modKind > > is 12 (new) *Event Command Set* Composite Command Case > > MethodExitWithReturnValue Case MonitorContendedEnter Case > > MonitorContendedEntered Case MonitorWait Case MonitorWaited new > > Error > > Constant: THREAD_NOT_ALIVE 15 Some EventKind Constants Updates > > > > 2008/2/22, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > On 2/22/08, Jimmy,Jing Lv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > As discussed before, we can start JDWP updating and improving. > > > > IMHO, let's start from the easiest way, updating to java 6. > > > > My proposal is: > > > > 1. Setup a branch of JDKTools for java6 in harmony repository > > > > 2. add/improve JDWP functions into java6 level. As the main updating > > > > for java6 JDWP is about JDWP-protocol, it seems no much effect on VM > > > > and debugger. > > > > > > > > As M5 freeze will be done at the end of this week, may start > > > > from next week on. Any comments/suggestions/Volunteers? Thanks! > > > > > > I think the branch can be created right now - M5 code freeze relates > > > to the trunk only. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Stepan. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Best Regards! > > > > > > > > Jimmy, Jing Lv > > > > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu > > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Jim Yu （虞俊杰） > > China Software Development Lab, IBM >
-- Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu China Software Development Lab, IBM
