Stepan, Thanks for your interest! May be I was too harsh, and the support was not broken. The only problem is the FIXME comment itself introduced by the commit [1] of HARMONY-204.
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/archive/src/main/java/java/util/jar/JarVerifier.java?r1=384239&r2=391283&pathrev=410562&diff_format=h On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/28/08, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > While people seem busy with developing a Netscape plug-in, I wonder > > what we should do with Netscape signtool support in the archive > > module. The tool [1] itself seems to be dead, and I cannot check if > > HARMONY-204 really breaks that support. It seems so from the comment. > > I suggest either undoing HARMONY-204 changes related to signtool > > support, > > Hi Alexei, > > I don't see any connection between HARMONY-204 and Netscape signtool > support - the JIRA (as well the spec.) doesn't mention Netscape tool > at all. As I understood HARMONY-204 description and comments - it > fixed Harmony bug and align it with the spec. and RI behaviour. > > Could you clarify? > > Thanks, > Stepan. > > > > > or dropping the support completely. Thoughts? References to a > > living signtool instance? > > > > -- > > With best regards, > > Alexei > > > > [1] http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/1.3/docs/rsa_signing.html > > > -- With best regards, Alexei
