Nathan, The patch is not in yet. The idea of debugging release build of class library looks somewhat peculiar to me.
Do I miss some scenario here? Should we introduce build switch to make it possible to add LVT information to release if required? Pavel. On 3/1/08, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It may be too late, but I vote -1 on this change. 1.5M reduction > doesn't offset the loss of no longer seeing the local variables during > debug. > > -Nathan > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Gregory Shimansky > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alexey Petrenko said the following on 28.02.2008 16:52: > > > > > Will Eclipse debug work with the release build of Harmony in this case? > > > > It will but with absence of local variable tables it probably won't show > > local variables in context. > > > > > > > 2008/2/28, Pavel Pervov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> I would like to propose the following improvement to class library > > >> build - build in release with only line number information in .class > > >> files. > > >> > > >> It saves ~1.5MB in jre size. > > >> > > >> If no objections then I'll commit HARMONY-5558. > > >> > > >> P.S. The patch in that JIRA introduces switchable compression for jar > > >> files containing class library classes. Default mode is kept > > >> compressed. > > > > > > -- > > Gregory > > > > > -- Pavel Pervov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
