Nikolay, could you post a Java method here to reproduce the issue? On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Nikolay Kurtov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I compiled the same class with JET and OPT, and found a difference in > bytecode-mapping > > One of branches of switch goes to this code: > ;; 58) ILOAD_0 > ;; 59) BIPUSH 45 > ;; 61) IADD > ;; 62) I2B > ;; 63) ISTORE_1 > .... > So, after the recompilation by OPT, the block should begin from bcOffset > 58 > > In OPT after translator I found in irdump the following block > Block L5: > Predecessors: ENTRY_L0 > Successors: L8 > I5:L5: bcmap:59 > I34:ldci4 #45 -) t14:int32 > I35:add t1, t14 -) t15:int32 > I36:convi1 t15 -) t16:int32 > I37:stvar t16 -) v1:int32 > .... > > The block begins from bcOffset 59 > I consider these values in JET and OPT should be equal. > Is it a bug? > > Now I'm exploring the code of JavaByteCodeTranslator and IRBuilder but > cannot figure out the cause of problem > Can you advise me how to fix it? > > -- > Regards, > Nikolay > > mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Mikhail Fursov
