Sian January wrote:
Well it doesn't look like there were many objections to this even if there's
not overwhelming support :-)
I support bringing this in, just catching up on the tasks!
I'm not sure of the process now - do we need to have a formal vote?
Since this is 'repurposed' code we need to bring it in through the IP
clearance process. That means checking the documentation, calling a
formal vote, and getting the nod from the incubator PMC.
I'm happy to shepherd it through the process - before trying to get back
to doing some coding <g>.
Or would it be best to wait until after M6 in case anyone else does have an
opinion that they haven't had time to express?
That bit took care of itself ;-)
Regards,
Tim
On 30/04/2008, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
This is a very useful tool. Thank you, Sian.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Sian January
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have been looking at the javap contribution from Dmitry Kononov in
HARMONY-1680 and I think it would be good to include this in
Harmony. It
requires a little bit of work to fit it into the jdktools project and
rename
it to javap (it's currently ijp), but not very much. I would be happy
to
bring this in if there are no objections.
What do people think?
Thanks,
Sian
--
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
--
With best regards,
Alexei
