On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you see any other way to keep IBM VM running? Can't IBM VM extend its j.l.Thread correspondingly? Can't IBM VM copy current ThreadLocal implementation to _its_ kernel classes?
The thing is, I presume we have an example of backporting the good change from Android (?) back to Harmony. Having this in mind I'd rather see this change adopted in classlib code rather than hidden in DRLVM kernel classes. Thanks, Aleksey.
