Xiao-Feng Li wrote: > Great work! I will review it. Yes, good to see this work evolving in Harmony. I'll be interested to see some results of running on different workloads.
Regards, Tim > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Simon.Zhou (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [DRLVM][gc]Concurrent GC phase redesign and scheduler improvement >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: HARMONY-5989 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5989 >> Project: Harmony >> Issue Type: Improvement >> Components: DRLVM >> Affects Versions: 5.0M7 >> Environment: Windows and Linux platform >> Reporter: Simon.Zhou >> Fix For: 5.0M7 >> >> >> Now, Tick is Concurrent GC implementation in Harmony, I improve it in 3 ways: >> 1, State-based synchronization of mutators and gc collectors. >> 2, improve the concurrent gc scheduler >> 3, fix some bugs, one is the bug for array copy, so the vmcore module should >> be updated also. >> >> it has 18% performance speedup compared with original implementation. >> later I will upload a more detail description for this issue. >> >> -- >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> - >> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. >> >> > > >
