Sian January wrote: > Sorry not to reply on the other thread a bit earlier, but isn't this > part of the spec? > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/nio/channels/SelectableChannel.html#register(java.nio.channels.Selector, > int, java.lang.Object) says that register "throws > IllegalSelectorException - If this channel was not created by the same > provider as the given selector"
They are both coming from the same provider (Harmony's in-built provider). > I wasn't 100% clear from the other thread - is it that the RI doesn't > follow the spec, or were we throwing the exception in the wrong case? The spec doesn't preclude setting a selector that has an empty interest set. It's unusual but shouldn't really be forbidden, so I think the patch should be good to go in. I'm just looking for an OK now that we are in code freeze. Regards, Tim
