Agree. 2008/12/9 Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 李竞沁 wrote: > > Agree. Maybe our process should be find whether the user has specify a > > Accept Header, if not use the default one. > > For sure, you don't want to overwrite a user defined Accept:, but I'm > with Nathan that we should default to *, */* unless we see a good reason > to do otherwise. > > Regards, > Tim > > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > >> 2008/12/8 Kevin Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> Maybe this violates the HTTP/1.1 spec, should we abandon these servers? > >>> No, I don't think so. RI, IE and Firefox all send Accept header to > >> support > >>> such servers. > >>> Why don't we follow this as well to satisfy with our potential clients? > >> I don't think the question is about setting Accept or not, it's the > >> actual value used. It's not surprising that IE and Firefox and most > >> web browesrs set an Accept that says they know HTML, GIFs and JPEGs - > >> they are web browsers, that's what they do. This isn't a web browser, > >> this is just a raw HTTP socket connection. It has no knowledge of what > >> the code using it would prefer. > >> > >> Yes we should be compatible with the RI, but we should also try not to > >> be silly. I suggest setting Accept to just be a wildcard. This should > >> satisfy all conditions. > >> > >> -Nathan > >> > >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:55 AM, 李竞沁 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Kevin,I have these questions: > >>>> 1. What will the server, which is not compatible with HTTP 1.1, do if > it > >>>> receives a HTTP 1.1 request? ( Our HTTP header has told that it is a > >> HTTP > >>>> 1.1 request.) > >>>> 2. Should this be a server's misbehavior because spec does not insist > >> send > >>>> accept header? Or are there any common rules to guide this behavior? ( > >> Do > >>>> we > >>>> only miss accept header?) > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Kevin Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >>>>> Charles wrote, > >>>>>> The spec of Http said that "all headers except Host are optional." > >> It > >>>> is > >>>>> what the RI does. > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, I think we should be compatible with RI's behaviors. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Yours sincerely, > >>>> Charles Lee > >>>> > > > > > > > -- Yours sincerely, Charles Lee
