Tim Ellison wrote: > LUNI's dependency on AWT is bad, and an easy one to fix -- I'll do that :-)
Done [1]. That should not be a controversial change, since the code has always used Class#forName to look up the content handler. I just changed it to look in an AWT package for the image content handlers rather looking than a LUNI package, which makes sense to me anyway. If you have AWT present it will return the image, if not it returns the byte stream. [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=726694&view=rev Regards, Tim
