Sean, thanks. I think, this is a great step. BTW, I think it makes sense to separate implementation independent tests (if any) into a separate bundle. This may be a hard task though.
Thanks. On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Sean Qiu <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess HDK could pick up it from classlib. > So both of them could make use of it. > > What do you think about it? > > 2009/4/9 Mark Hindess <[email protected]>: > > > > In message <[email protected]>, > Sean > > Qiu writes: > >> > >> 2009/4/9 Alexey Varlamov <[email protected]>: > >> > Thanks for doing this work Sean, it's a long-expected move I believe. > >> > > >> > >> Yes, I'll do it by modules. > >> > >> > Just a minor suggestion: it seems "setting.properties" is in fact > >> > "test.properties", let's name it accordingly? > >> > >> Sure, thanks for reminding. > >> > >> > Please go ahead with commit anyway. > >> > >> Great. :-) > > > > +1 > > > > You mention creating a new artifact to store the tests but I believe the > > intention has always been that the current hdk artifact should contain > > the test jars. > > > > Regards, > > Mark. > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu > -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://www.telecom-express.ru/ http://people.apache.org/~aaf/ http://harmony.apache.org/ http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/
