Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Since we have started talking about stuff inside Java6. > > For StAX, can we use woodstox - http://woodstox.codehaus.org/
I see that is dual license, including ALv2 so that's a contender. > For JAXB, we dont' have any other choice other than JAXB RI - > https://jaxb.dev.java.net/ - Would CDDL be acceptable? Only in binary form. According to the (ever draft) 3rd party licensing policy [1] we can redistribute the binary JAR under CDDL with appropriate labeling. This is likely the most pragmatic way forward. [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html > Bringing up StAX and JAXB, since JAX-WS needs both. > > For JAX-WS, we can do either Apache CXF or Apache Axis2 or let a user > choose which one to install like they do in Geronimo. Advantage with CXF > is that it has tooling for code generation as well (similar to wsimport > and wsgen in the JDK6) Ack. Regards, Tim > On 04/30/2009 04:25 PM, Jesse Wilson wrote: >> 2009/4/29 Alexei Fedotov<alexei.fedo...@gmail.com> >> >>> Also it needs checking why Android uses different XML parsers (maybe >>> we can >>> switch to better ones as well?) >>> >> >> Harmony's XML stack is quite large. We Androids created our own >> implementation that omits features like XSLT. Our code is built on >> xmlpull.org, kxml2, and a high-performance native >> parser<http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/dalvik.git;a=blob;f=libcore/xml/src/main/java/org/apache/harmony/xml/ExpatParser.java;h=60d74b8a5283ad4bd2d66c5866960c391c2340f2;hb=master> >> >> . >> >> Cheers, >> Jesse >> >> PS: although this code is in the org.apache.harmony package, it isn't >> Harmony-sourced. We've been using org.apache.harmony as an 'internal >> implementation' package, which confuses things. >> >
