Tim Ellison wrote:
Sebb commented on HARMONY-6155:
I think there are still some tweaks to be made.
There seem to be some items missing from the NOTICE file - I
would expect this to mention most, if not all, of the 3rd party items.
For example:
ICU4C
Copyright (c) 1995-2005 International Business Machines Corporation and others
All rights reserved.
What are the criteria you are applying to determine which third-party
items are put in the NOTICE file rather than the LICENSE file?
http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
"2. The remainder of the NOTICE file is to be used for required
third-party notices."
If you take a look at the (canonical) example of httpd's NOTICE [1] and
LICENSE [2] you can see similar distinctions.
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/NOTICE?view=co
[2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/LICENSE?view=co
Exactly, the NOTICE file contains the attributions, the LICENSE file
contains the licenses.
As far as I can tell, at least some of the Hrmony licenses require
attribution.
[BTW, do you still use both versions of ICU4C?]
No. Why do you ask? Are you confusing the ICU4C and ICU4J entries?
Yes, sorry.
ZLIB version 1.2.3
(C) 1995-2004 Jean-loup Gailly and Mark Adler
etc.
But not Apache Yoko, and probably not necessary for the IETF RFCs
Regards,
Tim
