In message <[email protected]>,
Mark Hindess writes:
>
> In message <[email protected]>, Oliver Deakin writes:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've just run the classlib tests on Windows x86 on the latest code in
> > the federated build and I don't see anything catastrophic there. There's
> > 1 failure in the portlib tests, in hymmap, which I think is a test case
> > off-by-one error. I've attached a patch [1] which fixes the test. Apart
> > from that we look clean.
> >
> > Does anyone have any other test reports? Any other platforms? I'm
> > assuming we're taking r778555 as our testing base for M10.
>
> I think we said we were going to test building from source this time
> around so I'm testing that:
>
>
> ant bundle-src
> tar xzf target/apache-harmony-src-r778555-snapshot.tar.gz
> cd apache-harmony-src-r778555
> ant fetch-depends snapshot
> ant -Dtest.jre.home=$PWD/target/hdk/jdk/jre -f working_classlib/build.xml
> test
>
> works on Linux. We need to check that this builds a sane binary
> snapshot with the correct version information in the various jars, etc.
>
> I'll report back once my test run is complete.
Well, I had some test failures caused by timeouts in BasicSwingTestCase.
For example:
javax.swing.BoxLayoutTest.testLayoutContainerVertical
Failure Test interrupted due timeout 10.094
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Test interrupted due timeout
at javax.swing.BasicSwingTestCase.runBare (BasicSwingTestCase.java:147)
but I've seen these before on my laptop so they aren't blockers for M10.
I also had two test crashes:
org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.SocketTest
org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.SSLSocketImplTest
which were both fixed by Ilya's patch in HARMONY-6132.
I think it would be good to apply the patch from HARMONY-6132 before M10.
Does anyone else support/oppose this?
Regards,
Mark.
