Mark Hindess wrote: > In message <[email protected]>, Tim Ellison writes: >> The first thing I tried after successfully building from source, was >> java -version. >> >> In M9 it prints out: >> c:\harmony-jdk-761593\jre\bin>java -version >> Apache Harmony Launcher : (c) Copyright 1991, 2008 The Apache Software >> Foundation or its licensors, as applicable. >> java version "1.5.0" >> pre-alpha : not complete or compatible >> svn = r761593, (Apr 3 2009), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, release build >> http://harmony.apache.org >> >> but in the M10 candidate it only prints: >> c:\apache-harmony-src-r781724\target\hdk\jdk\jre\bin>java -version >> java version "1.5.0" >> Apache Harmony (1.5.0) >> DRLVM (11.2.0) >> >> which is a regression IMHO, and so I'm inclined to vote -1 on this >> release candidate. Besides the all important copyright statement >> missing, when we gather JIRAs we ask people to tell us the version they >> are running and without the specific platform/revision it is useless. > > I agree. > >> The regression seems to have come in as r763589. > > Oliver changed this but he's not around so I'd like to revert this > commit[0]. Any other committers approve this?
I agree with reverting the change. Regards, Tim > [0] It is a good idea though and I'll re-commit it after M10 and think > about what is required to fix it properly. > > >
