Mark Hindess wrote:
In message <4a7af437.8080...@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes:
[snip]Im going to start investigating the test failures I see running the JDWP
suites with the Java 6 agent to make sure they are not caused by any
other use of Java 6 features I may have missed.
I'm just doing another merge of jdktools/trunk to
jdktools/branches/java6 and out of curiosity I checked the diff between
trunk and java6 (excluding modules/jpda) and there were no differences
except the merge changes I am testing.
That's good to know, thanks.
I wonder if we really need a java6 jdktools branch - we could always
recreate it if we need it and at the moment it just seems to be
overhead.
Yep, I agree - Im looking at the JDWP test failures in the Java 6 branch
at the moment and will be raising JIRAs for them. If they can be
resolved then I think we will be in a good position to take JDWP in the
Java 6 branch as head and remove that branch altogether.
Regards,
Oliver
Regards,
Mark
--
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
