Surely will help whenever possible. Thanks, xiaofeng
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a discussion on bui...@a.o about setting up a Windows build > machine as part of the ASF infrastructure. > > Looks like there is a good possibility provided there are enough people > to help administer it for everyone. > > Not sure what the criteria are (committer?) but I think it would be > useful for Harmony to have public Windows builds on Hudson too, so > please consider helping. > > Regards, > Tim > > On 27/Oct/2009 09:09, Tim Ellison wrote: >> On 27/Oct/2009 01:24, Nathan Beyer wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Charles Ditzel <cldte...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Thanks, Nathan. I still don't see a 64 bit Windows Harmony JVM >>>> in the site Downloads section. [comments embedded] >>>> >>>> On Oct 24, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Nathan Beyer wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Charles Ditzel <cldte...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> [[My apologies if this is the wrong mailing list - I was directed here >>>>>> and >>>>>> hope this is appropriate] >>>>>> >>>>>> I am trying to understand the level of support Harmony's JVM has for >>>>>> Windows >>>>>> 2008/2008R2 >>>>>> and for 64 bit support of Windows. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 64 bit Windows Server 2008 R2 and with Harmony 5.0M11 after setting >>>>>> the >>>>>> JAVA_HOME and PATH >>>>>> variables I tried doing a java -version : >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> C:\Users\Administrator.PERF06>java -version >>>>>> Windows 6.1 is not supported >>>>>> HMYEXEL062E Internal VM error: Failed to create Java VM >>>>>> FAILED to invoke JVM. >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> So I'm trying to figure out if I did something wrong, if there is a patch >>>>>> I >>>>>> need >>>>>> and generally I'm trying to understand the following : >>>>>> - is Harmony going to have more versions of JVM for Windows (64 bit) >>>>> I think some of the compiles for Windows are already 64-bit, at least >>>>> for x86_64. I can't recall if Itanium is workable. >>>> Running on Dual AMD Opteron Quad-Core (2.30 Ghz) system. >>>> >>>> I looked at the Harmony downloads site and I only find under >>>> Stable Builds, ( JRE, JDK, HDK) : >>>> Apache Harmony 5.0M11 JRE for 32 bit >>> The lack of a Windows 64-bit build is mostly due to the lack of any >>> contributors with a 64-bit Windows machine and a version of >>> VisualStudio to perform the compiles. >> >> Exactly. So Charles, if you have such a machine please try compiling >> from source and report back on any problems. There is no inherent >> objection to that platform, just practicalities getting in the way. >> You'll find a bunch of people happy to help resolve the issues. >> >> If I can find a Windows 64-bit machine with Windows Server 2008 I'll >> have a go. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >>>> under Snapshot Builds for Harmony 5.0 - it takes me to the Linux builds ... >>>> I tried >>>> going up a level to the Hudson builds and its all Linux. >>>> >>>> same with the snapshot builds for Harmony 5.0. >>>> >>> All Hudson builds are Linux - there aren't any Windows build machines >>> available. >>> >>>> I can't seem to find the 64 bit Windows version of Harmony in any of the >>>> Download location. >>>> >>>>>> - is the existing Windows 32 bit release work with Windows Server 2008 >>>>>> and >>>>> This is probably just a matter of getting the OS version level check >>>>> to allow Windows Server 2008. No one has asked/complained yet ... feel >>>>> free submit a patch. >>>> Could be that. I will also double check it on a different machine with >>>> slower CPUs. >>>> >>>>>> Windows Server 2008 R2 (64 bit) ? if so where do I get it ? >>>>>> - is there a 6.0 release of Harmony ? >>>>>> - i have seen references to 5.0M12 but it does not seem to be on >>>>>> Harmony's >>>>>> download area - is it available ? >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks and apologies if this is the wrong alias. >>>>>> >> > -- http://people.apache.org/~xli
