On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Being consistent on checked exceptions like IOException is still > beneficial, > > and we should continue to maintain our current behaviour. > > Being consistent ... on throwing priority? So you are suggesting that > we continue to enforce priority order for multiple errors resulting in > exceptions outside the set above? > > Just trying to understand precisely what you are proposing. > My focusing on a specific set of exceptions makes more complicated than necessary; sorry about that. Ultimately I agree with the RI's decision that it is bogus to either specify or enforce a particular exception priority.
