I think it is EMMA's report. Maybe we should find a place to put these reports. So we can know exactly what test coverage rate we have got for each module
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Nathan Beyer (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802604#action_12802604 > ] > > Nathan Beyer commented on HARMONY-6420: > --------------------------------------- > > I'm curious about how you gathered the coverage data? That would a valuable > contribution on it's own. > >> [test] Increase the method coverage rate for unit test >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Key: HARMONY-6420 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6420 >> Project: Harmony >> Issue Type: Test >> Components: Classlib >> Affects Versions: 5.0M12 >> Reporter: Jim Yu >> Fix For: 5.0M13 >> >> Attachments: baseline-report.zip, Result-report.zip >> >> >> I recently generated a coverage report for Harmony trunk and would like to >> contribute more test cases to increase the method coverage rate for it. >> Currently, these patches are made for the main modules as below. After >> applying these patches, the average method coverage rate for these modules >> can reach 90% above. I also attached the reports of the baseline and the >> result with patches. >> java.io >> java.lang >> java.lang.instrument >> java.lang.reflect >> javax.print.* >> java.net >> java.util >> javax.sql.* >> javax.acessibility > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > -- Regards, Ray Chen
