In message <4b976763.5060...@gmail.com>, Regis writes:
>
> On 2010-03-07 19:03, Mark Hindess wrote:
> >
> > In message<4b933b24.9060...@gmail.com>, Regis writes:
> >>
> >> On 2010-03-03 17:31, Mark Hindess wrote:
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Deven.
> >>>
> >>> We should move to a process that downloads the upstream zip using the
> >>> standard {check,fetch}-depends mechanism to make it easier to update in
> >>> future. Ideally the dependency should be pushed down to the luni module
> >>> where it really belongs.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> -Mark.
> >>>
> >>> In message<4b90c728.5020...@gmail.com>, Regis writes:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2010-03-03 16:34, Deven You wrote:
> >>>>> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6460, since
> >>>>> java spec require fdlibm5.3, I think we should upgrade it from at
> >>>>> present 5.2 to 5.3.
> >>>>> What about your opinions? Thanks a lot!
> >>>>
> >>>> Great founding! It seems fdlibm5.3 is released earlier than Harmony
> >>>> project starting (fdlibm5.3 revised October 2002, when Harmony
> >>>> project is not started yet), I don't know why we didn't pick the
> >>>> latest version, but used the older one. Is there any concern
> >>>> here? If not, I think we should upgrade it after M13 released.
> >>
> >> I attached a new patch on HARMONY-6460 to maintains fdlibm dependency
> >> by "standard {check,fetch}-depends mechanism", please help to review
> >> if that the right way to do this. Thanks.
> >
> > As I said before, ideally, since this dependency is required only by
> > luni, then this dependency should be dealt with in modules/luni/build.xml
> > not in the top-level build/depends files. See the awt dependencies for
> > a similar example of this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mark.
>
> Thanks Mark, new patch followed your suggestion applied at r921268.
Great. Thanks.
-Mark
