On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/Jun/2010 05:10, Lang Yang wrote: > > Thanks! > > > > According to my original proposal [0], I am supposed to complete the > > following items by the end of this week (week 3): > > - spi.ServiceRegistry > > - spi.IIOServiceProvider > > - spi.ImageInputStreamSpi > > - spi.ImageOutputStreamSpi > > - spi.ImageWriterSpi > > - spi.ImageReaderSpi > > > > Except few methods are still missing in spi.ServiceRegistry, everything > > thing else has been resolved. Those missing methods are currently being > > implemented, patches are expected to be submitted in next two days, stay > > tuned! > > You seem to be making good progress! > Thanks, I have submitted another 3 patches today. There will be no NotImplementedException markers in javax.imageio.spi package! > > Since the GSoC official started on May 24th, there is a period that the > code > > is frozen. At that time, I didn’t write code because one of the patches > need > > be committed in order to move on. Instead, I had taken time looked deeper > > into other part of codes and the build system to get a better idea of > > Harmony and ImageIO package. Although it has blocked my progress for a > bit, > > but I believe it will boost my next moves. > > Spending some time to get familiar with the codebase is not a bad thing, > and of course you can continue to send patches to JIRA during a release > freeze. If you find you are really blocked please ask for a temporary > private branch which we can provide for you to make progress. > Private branches are usually discouraged because we should all be > testing and fixing the release candidate, but as a GSoC I appreciate you > need to make progress on a given timetable. > I think get familiar code is actually good for me, I don't mind it at all. The release freeze didn't block me for too long. Hopefully, I can join you guys on fixing urgent bugs for release candidate at next code freeze ;) > > > In the next few weeks, I would like to implement other missing > > functionalities in classes: > > - stream.ImageOutputStreamImpl > > - ImageTypeSpecifer > > - ImageIO > > > > I think this is great idea that reports my progress to the community > every > > 1-2 weeks to let everyone knows what I have done, what needs to be done. > If > > nobody thinks this is spam, I will do so :) > > Not spam at all! It's great to hear about what you are doing. Please > share any joys and problems so we can all join in the fun with you. > Sure, I would definitely like to share joys and bother you guys with dumb problem :-D > > I'm committing some of your patches, and it is good to see they are > small and well contained, so easy to review. Keep it up. > > Regards, > Tim > > > Thanks everyone again for patiently teaching me, > > > > Lang > > > > [0] my proposal - http://bit.ly/96eilc > > > > > > 2010/6/11 Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com> > > > >> Hello Lang, > >> Thank you for your patches to javax.imageio package. Tim and I committed > >> them yesterday. I liked how you approached the problem with solid tests > and > >> wrote clear test driven code. I'd like to share your success with the > >> community. > >> > >> How is you progress according to the plan? What do you plan to do next? > >> What is the closest step? > >> > >> -- > >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > >> http://www.telecom-express.ru/ > >> http://harmony.apache.org/ > >> http://dataved.ru/ http://klsh.ru/ > >> > >> > > >
