In message <aanlktinqstlj8bzb0vztyr9-zbavrvqmfe08fh4to...@mail.gmail.com>, Antony Miguel writes: > > Any idea where or when I can get a snapshot build of this updated code > (either a stable build or just a head build)? I don't have the > capacity to build Harmony at the moment...
32-bit or 64-bit? I'll try to build one tomorrow. > Also just to check - have you added 6.1 as a supported platform or > changed to code to run with anything of Windows version 6.1 or above? > I ask simply because if anyone builds a product which distributes a > Harmony JVM they will find that they have to again notify > dev@harmony.apache.org of this, then rebuild and re-release their > product just to support new windows platforms which they might > otherwise work fine with...? At the moment, I've added it to the version list. I'd like to hear back if there are any test failures on Windows 7 before deciding what to do about the platform checking. Logically however one would hope that windows maintains reasonable backwards compatibility so doing a greater than version check would seem reasonable. Regards, Mark. > On 28 June 2010 21:34, Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > In message <aanlktimrqnftvsy0m6hrr3uuqizz8hf-il_flvcba...@mail.gmail.com>, > > Antony Miguel writes: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I apologise in advance if this is not the appropriate category, I'm > >> not sure exactly where the issue would be here. > >> > >> Today I downloaded the latest stable builds of Harmony (5.0 r946978 > >> and 6.0 r946981) and ran them on Windows 7. In both cases I got: > >> > >> " > >> Windows 6.1 is not supported > >> HMYEXEL062E Internal VM error: Failed to create Java VM > >> FAILED to invoked JVM. > >> " [snip] > > Since Michael suggests that this works, I've update the code at r958711. > > Let me know if that helps. > > Regards, > > Mark.
