On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Regis <xu.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2010-09-30 14:49, Charles Lee wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> Does anybody know why do we remain the commons-logging.jar in the xmlsec? >> >> I am asking about this because: >> 1. I have comment out the commons-logging.jar in the bootstrap-classpath >> and >> run all the testcase. No related failures occurred. (20002 test cases, 4 >> failures, 2 errors and 3 crashes). >> > > I think you'd better run xmlsec's test cases. >
good point. I have unzip the pack file in our depends, and run all test case by the ant script. With or without the commons-logging.jar in the lib of both xmlsec and ant returns the same result: 181 runs, 16 fails because of JKS things. Anyone know the history of this xmlsec module? > > 2. The *commons-logging.jar* included in the xmlsec is not the latest one. >> I >> found follows in the MANIFEST.MF: >> * >> * >> *Extension-Name: org.apache.commons.logging* >> *Specification-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation* >> *Specification-Version: 1.0* >> *Implementation-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation* >> *Implementation-Version: 1.0.4* >> * >> * >> the latest commons-logging version is 1.1.1. And u can find the CHANGELOG >> here<http://commons.apache.org/logging/RELEASE-NOTES.txt> . I do care >> about >> the LOGGING-115<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-115>, >> because >> >> lots of hadoop unit test case fail on this issue. >> >> >> > Not sure whether xmlsec could work with the latest commons-logging, even > so, we may still have to face similar problems that one application must > work with specific commons-logging which is not the one we shipped. > > -- > Best Regards, > Regis. > -- Yours sincerely, Charles Lee
