Hello Mark:

Even with version 3.5.1 I still get the errors relating to "The type
package-info is already defined"

All the best,
Guillermo
----------------------------------------------
Emerging Internet Technology Group
gcab...@us.ibm.com
Office: +1-512-973-1973 (T/L: 363-1973)
Mobile: +1-956-522-0988


                                                                                
                                                              
  From:       Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com>                        
                                                              
                                                                                
                                                              
  To:         dev@harmony.apache.org                                            
                                                              
                                                                                
                                                              
  Date:       10/14/2010 02:01 AM                                               
                                                              
                                                                                
                                                              
  Subject:    Re: [testing] Type <x> already defined error in Harmony6          
                                                              
                                                                                
                                                              






Olivier Thomann writes:
>
> Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com> wrote on 2010-10-13 17:30:02:
> > That does seem likely.  I update ecj to 3.6.1 last week (prior to
> > that we were on 3.5.1 which might be worth trying).  It looks like
> > the fix is only in nightly builds.
> It is in latest I-build:
>
http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/I20101012-0800/index.php

> Search for ecj-I20101012-0800.jar.
> It will be in the upcoming 3.7M3 build.
>
> If you want a fix for 3.6.2, please update the bug report and explain
> why :-).

I guess we'd be happy enough pointing at the 3.7M3 milestone.  I was
wondering if in the meantime dropping back to 3.5.1 might be a good
idea.  Guillermo does 3.5.1 work for you?
-Mark.



Reply via email to