dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Daniel Gong
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Kevin Zhou
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Shi Jun Zhang
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Regis
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Deven You
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Mark Hindess
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Charles Lee
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC shu xiao
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Ray Chen
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Mohanraj Loganathan
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC 王晨
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Gregory Shimansky
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Alexey Petrenko
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Prashanth K S
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Yixun Zhou
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Jing Lv
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Catherine Hope
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [announce] Regis Xu joins Harmony PMC Jonathan Lu
• [classlib] String.toLowerCase/toUpperCase incorrect for supplementary characters (HARMONY-6649) Tim Ellison
  • Re: [classlib] String.toLowerCase/toUpperCase incorrect for supplementary characters (HARMONY-6649) Robert Muir
  • Re: [classlib] String.toLowerCase/toUpperCase incorrect for supplementary characters (HARMONY-6649) Tim Ellison
  • Re: [classlib] String.toLowerCase/toUpperCase incorrect for supplementary characters (HARMONY-6649) Robert Muir
  • Re: [classlib] String.toLowerCase/toUpperCase incorrect for supplementary characters (HARMONY-6649) Tim Ellison
  • Re: [classlib] String.toLowerCase/toUpperCase incorrect for supplementary characters (HARMONY-6649) Robert Muir
  • Re: [classlib] String.toLowerCase/toUpperCase incorrect for supplementary characters (HARMONY-6649) Tim Ellison
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Harmony 5.0M15 and Apache Harmony 6.0M3 Tim Ellison
• Don't create/embed manifest files on Windows? Regis
  • Re: Don't create/embed manifest files on Windows? Regis
• questions about Non-bug differences from RI category Robert Muir
  • Re: questions about Non-bug differences from RI category Tim Ellison
  • Re: questions about Non-bug differences from RI category Robert Muir
  • Re: questions about Non-bug differences from RI category Robert Muir
  • Re: questions about Non-bug differences from RI category Mark Hindess
• [build] Fail to fetch depends on AIX ppc 64 machine Shi Jun Zhang
  • Re: [build] Fail to fetch depends on AIX ppc 64 machine Mark Hindess
  • Re: [build] Fail to fetch depends on AIX ppc 64 machine Shi Jun Zhang
• [Classlib] Add a new module for javax.tools in Harmony 6? Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [Classlib] Add a new module for javax.tools in Harmony 6? Mark Hindess
• [classlib][auth] Compatibility with RI in auth module Colin Thorne
  • Re: [classlib][auth] Compatibility with RI in auth module Colin Thorne
• [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 sebb
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 sebb
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Catherine Hope
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Prashanth K S
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Mark Hindess
  • [result] [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [result] [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [result] [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [result] [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [result] [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3 Mark Hindess
  • [website] updating download page (was: Re: [result] [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3) Tim Ellison
  • Re: [website] updating download page (was: Re: [result] [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3) Mark Hindess
  • Re: [website] updating download page (was: Re: [result] [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3) Mark Hindess
• [milestone] create freebsd x86_64 binaries? Mark Hindess
  • Re: [milestone] create freebsd x86_64 binaries? Tim Ellison
  • Re: [milestone] create freebsd x86_64 binaries? Mark Hindess
  • Re: [milestone] create freebsd x86_64 binaries? Tim Ellison
  • Re: [milestone] create freebsd x86_64 binaries? Lang Yang
• [vote] Declare r991518 as 5.0 milestone 15 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991518 as 5.0 milestone 15 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991518 as 5.0 milestone 15 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991518 as 5.0 milestone 15 Catherine Hope
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991518 as 5.0 milestone 15 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991518 as 5.0 milestone 15 Sian January
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991518 as 5.0 milestone 15 sebb
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991518 as 5.0 milestone 15 Mark Hindess
  • [result] [vote] Declare r991518 as 5.0 milestone 15 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [result] [vote] Declare r991518 as 5.0 milestone 15 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [result] [vote] Declare r991518 as 5.0 milestone 15 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r991518 as 5.0 milestone 15 Tim Ellison
• Windows 64-bit can't work on Windows 2003 Regis
  • RE: Windows 64-bit can't work on Windows 2003 Garrett Serack
  • Re: Windows 64-bit can't work on Windows 2003 Tim Ellison
  • RE: Windows 64-bit can't work on Windows 2003 Garrett Serack
  • Re: Windows 64-bit can't work on Windows 2003 Regis
  • RE: Windows 64-bit can't work on Windows 2003 Garrett Serack
  • Re: Windows 64-bit can't work on Windows 2003 Regis
• [jira] Bulk change of issues targeting next milestone Tim Ellison
  • Re: [jira] Bulk change of issues targeting next milestone Christian Peter
  • Re: [jira] Bulk change of issues targeting next milestone Tim Ellison
• [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Tim Ellison
  • Re: [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Catherine Hope
  • Re: [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Mark Hindess
  • Re: [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Charles Lee
  • Re: [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Tim Ellison
  • Re: [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Mark Hindess
  • Re: [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Tim Ellison
  • Re: [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Tim Ellison
  • Re: [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Mark Hindess
  • Re: [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Catherine Hope
  • Re: [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Mark Hindess
  • Re: [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [testing] Java 6 branch results so far Oliver Deakin
• [testing] Proposed fix for PriorityQueue Tim Ellison
  • Re: [testing] Proposed fix for PriorityQueue Mark Hindess
• UTF-8 decode broken for supplementary characters? Robert Muir
  • Re: UTF-8 decode broken for supplementary characters? Deven You
  • Re: UTF-8 decode broken for supplementary characters? Robert Muir
  • Re: UTF-8 decode broken for supplementary characters? Robert Muir
  • Re: UTF-8 decode broken for supplementary characters? Mark Hindess
  • Re: UTF-8 decode broken for supplementary characters? Tim Ellison
  • Re: UTF-8 decode broken for supplementary characters? Robert Muir
• [testing] jdwp tests hanging Tim Ellison
• Re: Build failed in Hudson: Harmony-1.5-head-linux-x86_64-full-tests #302 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: Build failed in Hudson: Harmony-1.5-head-linux-x86_64-full-tests #302 Tim Ellison
  • Re: Build failed in Hudson: Harmony-1.5-head-linux-x86_64-full-tests #302 Oliver Deakin
• GC wonders Giampaolo Tomassoni
  • Re: GC wonders Deven You
  • RE: GC wonders Giampaolo Tomassoni
  • Re: GC wonders Deven You
  • Re: GC wonders Xiao-Feng Li
• German Java developer are angry about Oracle theUser BL
• [legal?] Any implication in using Harmony's print module in Android? Giampaolo Tomassoni
  • Re: [legal?] Any implication in using Harmony's print module in Android? Jesse Wilson
  • Re: [legal?] Any implication in using Harmony's print module in Android? Mark Hindess
  • RE: [legal?] Any implication in using Harmony's print module in Android? Giampaolo Tomassoni
  • Re: [legal?] Any implication in using Harmony's print module in Android? Tim Ellison
  • Re: [legal?] Any implication in using Harmony's print module in Android? Andrey Pavlenko
  • RE: [legal?] Any implication in using Harmony's print module in Android? Giampaolo Tomassoni
  • RE: [legal?] Any implication in using Harmony's print module in Android? Giampaolo Tomassoni
• Framework for Testing Serialization Matthias Wessendorf
  • Re: Framework for Testing Serialization Regis
  • Re: Framework for Testing Serialization Tim Ellison
• [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Tim Ellison
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Mark Hindess
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Tim Ellison
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Mark Hindess
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Tim Ellison
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Colin Thorne
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Lang Yang
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Colin Thorne
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Tim Ellison
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Charles Lee
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Charles Lee
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Catherine Hope
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Tim Ellison
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Mark Hindess
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Tim Ellison
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Ray Chen
  • Re: [milestone] Proposed next milestone plans Catherine Hope
• [build] fetch-depends having problems with the sourceforge mirror Sian January
  • Re: [build] fetch-depends having problems with the sourceforge mirror Tim Ellison
  • Re: [build] fetch-depends having problems with the sourceforge mirror Sian January
  • Re: [build] fetch-depends having problems with the sourceforge mirror Tim Ellison
  • Re: [build] fetch-depends having problems with the sourceforge mirror Mark Hindess
  • Re: [build] fetch-depends having problems with the sourceforge mirror Tim Ellison
  • Re: [build] fetch-depends having problems with the sourceforge mirror sebb
  • Re: [build] fetch-depends having problems with the sourceforge mirror Tim Ellison
  • Re: [build] fetch-depends having problems with the sourceforge mirror Sian January
• [GSoC] Project Final Report Daniel Gong
• [GSoC] Progress Report Lang Yang
  • Re: [GSoC] Progress Report Lang Yang
  • Re: [GSoC] Progress Report Mark Hindess
  • Re: [GSoC] Progress Report Lang Yang
• [classlib][archive]Deflater.setlevel throws IllegalStateException if inputBuffer is not null Mohanraj Loganathan
  • Re: [classlib][archive]Deflater.setlevel throws IllegalStateException if inputBuffer is not null Mohanraj Loganathan
• [OT][News] Oracle sues Google over Android operating system Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [OT][News] Oracle sues Google over Android operating system Deven You
  • Re: [OT][News] Oracle sues Google over Android operating system Daniel Gong
  • Re: [OT][News] Oracle sues Google over Android operating system Tim Ellison
• [drlvm] Should the referent of a PhantomReference be cleared before it is enqueued? Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [drlvm] Should the referent of a PhantomReference be cleared before it is enqueued? Deven You
  • Re: [drlvm] Should the referent of a PhantomReference be cleared before it is enqueued? Oliver Deakin
• [classlib][annotation]Add annotation processing APIs to Harmony 6 Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [classlib][annotation]Add annotation processing APIs to Harmony 6 Ray Chen
  • Re: [classlib][annotation]Add annotation processing APIs to Harmony 6 Jing Lv
• [luni] ObjectInputStream.java Matthias Wessendorf
  • Re: [luni] ObjectInputStream.java Mark Hindess
  • Re: [luni] ObjectInputStream.java Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [luni] ObjectInputStream.java Matthias Wessendorf
  • Re: [luni] ObjectInputStream.java Matthias Wessendorf
  • Re: [luni] ObjectInputStream.java Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [luni] ObjectInputStream.java Matthias Wessendorf
  • Re: [luni] ObjectInputStream.java Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [luni] ObjectInputStream.java Matthias Wessendorf
• [classlib][luni] ArrayList change benchmark results Mark Hindess
• [classlib][imageio]PositionStack Lang Yang
  • Re: [classlib][imageio]PositionStack Alexey Petrenko
  • Re: [classlib][imageio]PositionStack Lang Yang
  • Re: [classlib][imageio]PositionStack Lang Yang
• Re: svn commit: r982498 - /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib/modules/luni/src/main/java/java/util/ArrayList.java Oliver Deakin
• [classlib]Internal diagnostic information for native code Shi Jun Zhang
  • Re: [classlib]Internal diagnostic information for native code Regis
• Problem met when building jdktools alone Daniel Gong
  • Re: Problem met when building jdktools alone Regis

• Earlier messages
• Later messages